Michael Dylan Jimenez vs Roy Hobbs Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Dylan Jimenez vs R. Hobbs

Michael Dylan Jimenez
SGP
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
36
-
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Roy Hobbs
SIN
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
19
Age
36
-
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Jimenez 1 - 0 Hobbs
They have played 3 sets in total, with Michael Dylan Jimenez winning 2 and Roy Hobbs winning 1. The last match between Michael Dylan Jimenez and Roy Hobbs was at the M15 Singapore, 10-09-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Michael Dylan Jimenez getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jimenez | 1 |
| Hobbs | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Singapore(09-10-24)
Michael Dylan Jimenez
6
3
6
Roy Hobbs
2
6
4
M. D. Jimenez vs R. Hobbs H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 33.33% (12-24) | Career Total W/L | 36.02% (76-135) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. D. Jimenez vs R. Hobbs Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michael Dylan Jimenez has won 42.92% of points on their second serve, while Roy Hobbs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michael Dylan Jimenez, in recent form, has won 40.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Roy Hobbs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.60% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michael Dylan Jimenez has saved 55.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Roy Hobbs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michael Dylan Jimenez has won 32.26% of matches played (W/L 10/21), with Roy Hobbs winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michael Dylan Jimenez has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 8/18). Roy Hobbs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 4/4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 69/126).
- Player level: In the last year, Michael Dylan Jimenez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 32.26% of matches (W/L 10/21), where as Roy Hobbs has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michael Dylan Jimenez winning 1 times and Roy Hobbs being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Michael Dylan Jimenez winning 2 and Roy Hobbs winning 1.
- The last match between Michael Dylan Jimenez and Roy Hobbs was at the M15 Singapore, 10-09-2024, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Michael Dylan Jimenez getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michael Dylan Jimenez has played against opponents with an average rank of 216.29 while Roy Hobbs has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michael Dylan Jimenez has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Roy Hobbs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michael Dylan Jimenez has converted 40.54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Roy Hobbs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Michael Dylan Jimenez vs Roy Hobbs Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. D. Jimenez vs R. Hobbs H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:7:0 | Average Match Time | 2:7:0 |
| 34% (26/77) | 1st Serve % | 62% (52/84) |
| 73% (19/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (33/52) |
| 61% (31/51) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (3/4) |
| 44% (37/84) | Return Points Win % | 35% (27/77) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Jimenez 45%, Hobbs 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jimenez 45%, Hobbs 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Jimenez 49%, Hobbs 0%.
M. D. Jimenez Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-5 4-6 10-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R. Hobbs Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(1) 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||

M. D. Jimenez vs R. Hobbs Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.33% (12/24) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.02% (76/135) |
| 36.14% (30/53) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.41% (186/286) |
| 44.36% (358/449) | Games Win/Loss | 46.58% (2036/2335) |
| 30.77% (8/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 35.38% (69/126) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 32 | Aces Total | 150 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 43 | Total Double Faults | 235 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 196.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 254.12 |
| 59% (561/952) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1862/3152) |
| 61% (343/561) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1195/1862) |
| 45% (177/391) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (533/1290) |
| 39% (30/76) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (83/231) |
| 38% (342/912) | Return Points Win % | 35% (1037/3003) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 33.33% (12/24) | Futures W/L | 37.25% (76/128) |
| 33% (12/36) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (75/208) |
| 0% (0/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (23/48) |
| 45% (5/11) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (18/51) |
| 89% (9/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (84/67) |
| 11% (9/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (84/17) |
| 15% (27/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (127/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 17/11/25
Prediction07:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
02:00
H2H 0-0
02:00
H2H 0-0
04:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal